Source of Language Data

1. Doma A., Shoaib RM , Amar M. H., Exploration of Modify Genes Expression in Wheat via The Enhancement Of Bacillus Subtilis, Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological And Chemical Sciences, 2017.
2. Bogusz D., The Plant Cell, Australia, 1990.
3. Brown & Levinson, Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage, Cambridge University Press, 1987.
4. Coates J., Epistemic   Modality   And   Spoken   Discourse.  Transactions   Of   The Philological Society, 1987.
5. Coates J., The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries, London, 1983.
6. Garry C. Whitelam, Light And Plant Development, UK, Blackwell, 2007.
7. Holmes J., Hedging Your Bets, And Sitting On The Fence: Some Evidence For Hedges As Support Structures, Te Reo, 1984.
8. Hubler A., Understatements and Hedges in English, Amsterdam, 1983.
9. Jean-François Manen, Patrice Simon, the Plant Cell, Switzerland, 1991.
10. Jiayang Li, Richard Raba, Robert G. Amundson, The Plant Cell, New York, 1993.
11. Palmer F. R., Modality and the English Modals (2nd Ed), London, 1990.
12. Philip C. Lyons, John J. Evans, Charles W. Bacon, Plant Physiology, Georgia, 1990.
13. Powell J.M., An Evaluative Dimension of Vague Quantifying Expressions, Journal of Linguistics, 1985.
14. Prince E., On Hedging in Physician- Physician Discourse, New Jersey, 1982.
15. Quirk, R., A Grammar of Contemporary English, Harlow, Essex: Longman, 1972.
16. Rounds P. L., Hedging in written Academic discourse. Precision and Flexibility, University of Michigan, 1982.
17. Rusell F. Doolittle, the Protein Society, Mbridge University Press, USA, 2009.
18. Skelton, J., Comments in Academic Articles, Applied Linguistics in Society, London, 1988.
19. Stubbs, A matter of prolonged fieldwork’: Notes towards a modal grammar of English. Applied Linguistics, 1986.
20. Swales, J., Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings, Cambridge: CUP 1990.
21. Toulmin S. E., The Uses of Argument, 1958.
22. Trevor F. Moraes, Purification and Characterization of Phosphoenolpyruvate Carboxylase from Brassica napus (Canola) suspension cell cultures, Queen' s University Kingston, Ontario. Canada August, 1999.

Internet Sources

1. http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/pubman/item/escidoc:2271128:3/component/escidoc:2271430/austin_1962_how-to-do-things-with-words.pdf (accessed 20.11.2018)
2. http://www.justinecassell.com/discourse/pdfs/brown_yule_chap1.pdf(accessed  20.11.2018)
3. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ls/studypacks/Grice-Logic.pdf (accessed10.12.2018)
4. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00437956.1959.11659682(accessed 10.12.2018)
5. http://www.uky.edu/~ngrant/CJT780/readings/Day%206/Hosman1989a.pdf (23.01.2019)
6. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED426630.pdf (accessed 9.02.2019)
7. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/528a/a5a14e6ecfa08d17b559c0d2e3fb2c9f51bd.pdf (accessed 15.02.2019)
8. http://www.roselab.sci.waseda.ac.jp/resources/file/madissertation.pdf(accessed 7.03.2019)
9. http://www.bu.edu/sed/files/2010/10/2010-Pragmatic-Competence-The-Case-of-Hedging.pdf (accessed 13.03.2019)

CONTENTS

Introduction

Chapter One

Hesitation Phenomenon and Pauses in the Language of Science

1.1. English as a Language of Science

1.2. Hesitation in the Language of Science as a Way of Understatement

Chapter Two

Ways of Expressing Hesitation in the Language of Science

2.1.Communicative Types of Hesitation in the Language of Science

2.2. On the Linguistic Expression of Understatement in the Language of Science

Conclusion

Bibliography